Publisher’s Note: I can’t disagree with Trump on any reduction or nullification of any agency. Gut them all. But his virtue signaling by embracing the coproach, wanting to increase the military industrial complex by enormous amounts and a war on recreational marijuana is no sign or harbinger of either fiscal sobriety nor recognition of the superiority of localized subsidiarity. The most instructive lesson divined by the brief half-life of the Trump ascendency is the collectivists, the deep state and its media apologists have drawn the curtain and dropped the veil on their desires. The naked sublimation and destruction of individualliberty is job one for these creatures. My fear was more of the same and I loathe being right. Use your time wisely to prepare for the continuing Endarkenment because there is no stopping it. Consider this a pause to gather your family, increase your preps, continue training, refine your armory and get ready for the path ahead which will demand not only your life but will determine just how free your children may be. -BB
“All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome.” - George OrwellWe all experience the world through the shared stories and anecdotes that illuminate who we are and where we come from. Our educations, both formal and informal, drive the worldviews we develop over time. These are influenced universally by the transmission mediums we listen to or read about. Whether we are reading books (an increasingly uncommon practice), watching television, interacting on the internet or engaging in conversation with friends and family, all of these activities consistently and irrevocably develop and refine the way we view the world around us. First and foremost, our language and employment thereof has the most significant impact on us. I do not want to bother with the noxious collectivist apologias familiar to the deconstructionists like Chomsky and Foucault who profess that literary texts and contemporary conversation are freighted with the various Politically Correct bugbears like race, class and gender which to me is a neat but erroneous substitute for thinking things through. But they do make an important point: our language, in this case, English, informs and prejudices cogitation in an unconscious fashion that can short-circuit clear and conscious thinking. For example, prior to 1860, the use of the phrase “the United States are” was far more common than the post-1865 notion of the “the United States is”. Mark Twain “observed that the Civil War was fought over whether ‘United States’ was singular or plural”. Some attribute this to Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve, Professor of Greek at Johns Hopkins University, who wrote in 1909 that:
“[I]f I chose (sic), I might enlarge on the historical importance of grammar in general and Greek grammar in particular. It was a point of grammatical concord that was at the bottom of the Civil War – “United States are,” said one, “United States is,” said another.”The genesis of a bloody and, in the end, inglorious conflict may have been a dispute over grammatical construction, which informed the consciousness of millions.
03 March, 2017 / 2 Comments