The Unbearable Whiteness of Being by Bill Buppert

 

Publisher’s Note: Close the schools, every one of them. There is an opportunity here as some of the laziest people in human history, teachers in K-PhD, demand and clamor to retain their salary and benefits which have always been far more generous than they should thanks to unions and tenure for teachers and professors respectively. And these shiftless people also bear most of the responsibility for the intellectual wasteland that is the brainpower of three generations. Taking seriously the notion that the War to Save Josef Stalin made the world safe for communism, the entire American education took that on as a mission statement. 

And here we are. 

This about sums it up. Rod Serling was a seer.

Is the education establishment primarily responsible for the disaster that is 2020 for free range humanity? No, root cause has many parents. Critical thinking skills and the wherewithal to question authority has taken a long sleep in today’s Amerika.

 Defund universities and the police, that’s a good start. Everything government funds is poisonous and turns whatever it touches to shit.

 Government is the maximalist application of moral injury on a wholesale scale.

 You can thank half a century of climate alarmism based on nonsense, non-science, communist fever-dreams and the elevation of “experts” as the gateway drug to the deluded opium den delusions of the Peking Pox and its weaponization to game political power.

 Then the floodgates open as yet another victim of government policing assumes room temperature and the usual suspects in the government supremacist industry stoke the fires and spin the tires to behave destructively and predictably in the urban hives run by the CPUSA for decades.

All of this frisson and fire may magically evaporate if Comrade Joe and his bloated VP-thing manage to commit enough fraud to stuff the ballots for the Party that gave us the KKK, segregation, lunch tables, lynching, Jim Crow, the Great Society and the entry into every major conflict in the twentieth century until 1980. 

The Democrats as a party were founded to protect chattel slavery. Nothing has changed, the plantation boundaries and legal niceties have changed.

 In the end, left and right are an illusion as I have tirelessly opined but the Left [if I suspend my belief in self-assignation], they are the real plantation owners and leave right wing aspiration to owning human cattle in the dust. Just think of all the former inmates from totalitarian countries and their children that have come to America to be free and now they see the nightmare begin anew. I can only imagine the horror.

 Masks.

What tyrannical nonsense and that is where we live today. And keep in mind that the Karens of both sexes who call you out for not wearing a mask is not due to health concerns, but you don’t share their imperial conditioning. Nor do they have any faith their mask will protect them. Curiouser and curiouser. Prove me wrong. 

The Peking Pox peaked in April according to even the Fedgod.

Remember, if you oppose human slavery, communism and/or infanticide, you are now an enemy of the people. Burn that into your brain.

Per weapons, remember that every FFL dealer is a non-funded BATFE field office and their business depends on their Vichy collaboration with the agency that has brought you so much death and destruction. The F-Troop has so many informants now, they have Federal Form 3252.2.

…and get OFF social media. Social media, like the urinalists in the media, is a free range asylum.

In better news, have you listened to Pat Metheny’s latest album, “From This Place”? If not, you should.

While I am loathe to ban comments, any anti-semitism will be shunted to the trash. There are many places on the ‘net where you can spew and vent with abandon frothing with like-minded nitwits. Not here.

 Been to the range lately? -BB

“We would have been very (loath) to hurt the feelings of our fellow Jews, by going to a land that would exterminate them if it could.”

 — Sammy Luftspring and Norman “Babe” Yack (Canadian-Jewish boxers), July 6, 1936

“But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That’s the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked—if, let us say, the gassing of the Jews in ’43 had come immediately after the ‘German Firm’ stickers on the windows of non-Jewish shops in ’33. But of course this isn’t the way it happens. In between come all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next. Step C is not so much worse than Step B, and, if you did not make a stand at Step B, why should you at Step C? And so on to Step D.

And one day, too late, your principles, if you were ever sensible of them, all rush in upon you. The burden of self-deception has grown too heavy, and some minor incident, in my case my little boy, hardly more than a baby, saying ‘Jewish swine,’ collapses it all at once, and you see that everything, everything, has changed and changed completely under your nose. The world you live in—your nation, your people—is not the world you were born in at all. The forms are all there, all untouched, all reassuring, the houses, the shops, the jobs, the mealtimes, the visits, the concerts, the cinema, the holidays. But the spirit, which you never noticed because you made the lifelong mistake of identifying it with the forms, is changed. Now you live in a world of hate and fear, and the people who hate and fear do not even know it themselves; when everyone is transformed, no one is transformed. Now you live in a system which rules without responsibility even to God. The system itself could not have intended this in the beginning, but in order to sustain itself it was compelled to go all the way.”

― Milton Sanford Mayer, They Thought They Were Free: The Germans 1933-45

“Totalitarian politics—far from being simply antisemitic or racist or imperialist or communist—use and abuse their own ideological and political elements until the basis of factual reality, from which the ideologies originally derived their strength and their propaganda value—the reality of class struggle, for instance, or the interest conflicts between Jews and their neighbors—have all but disappeared.”

 “As far as the Jews were concerned, the transformation of the “crime” of Judaism into the fashionable “vice” of Jewishness was dangerous in the extreme. Jews had been able to escape from Judaism into conversion; from Jewishness there was no escape. A crime, moreover, is met with punishment; a vice can only be exterminated.”

 “A fundamental difference between modern dictatorships and all other tyrannies of the past is that terror is no longer used as a means to exterminate and frighten opponents, but as an instrument to rule masses of people who are perfectly obedient. Terror as we know it today strikes without any preliminary provocation, its victims are innocent even from the point of view of the persecutor. This was the case in Nazi Germany when full terror was directed against Jews, i.e., against people with certain common characteristics which were independent of their specific behavior. In Soviet Russia the situation is more confused, but the facts, unfortunately, are only too obvious. On the one hand, the Bolshevik system, unlike the Nazis, never admitted theoretically that it could practice terror against innocent people, and though in view of certain practices this may look like hypocrisy, it makes quite a difference. Russian practice, on the other hand, is even more “advanced” than the German in one respect: arbitrariness of terror is not even limited by racial differentiation, while the old class categories have long since been discarded, so that anybody in Russia may suddenly become a victim of the police terror. We are not concerned here with the ultimate consequence of rule by terror—namely, that nobody, not even the executors, can ever be free of fear; in our context we are dealing merely with the arbitrariness by which victims are chosen, and for this it is decisive that they are objectively innocent, that they are chosen regardless of what they may or may not have done.”

 ― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

 “As a form of neurosis, race-conscious nationalism almost always ignores logic and knowledge: In the East European civil wars between 1918 and 1920 Jews were slaughtered for a variety of contradictory reasons, as capitalists and as communists, as friends of the Ukrainians, as Polonophiles, as pro-German-just as it suited the circumstances.”

Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot

“Except for Christianity, the Nazis reject as Jewish everything which stems from Jewish authors. This condemnation includes the writings of those Jews who, like Stahl, Lassalle, Gumplowicz, and Rathenau, have contributed many essential ideas to the system of Nazism. But the Jewish mind is, as the Nazis say, not limited to the Jews and their offspring only. Many “Aryans” have been imbued with Jewish mentality—for instance the poet, writer, and critic Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, the socialist Frederick Engels, the composer Johannes Brahms, the writer Thomas Mann, and the theologian Karl Barth. They too are damned. Then there are whole schools of thought, art, and literature rejected as Jewish. Internationalism and pacifism are Jewish, but so is warmongering. So are liberalism and capitalism, as well as the “spurious” socialism of the Marxians and of the Bolsheviks. The epithets Jewish and Western are applied to the philosophies of Descartes and Hume, to positivism, materialism and empiro-criticism, to the economic theories both of the classics and of modern subjectivism. Atonal music, the Italian opera style, the operetta and the paintings of impressionism are also Jewish. In short, Jewish is what any Nazi dislikes. If one put together everything that various Nazis have stigmatized as Jewish, one would get the impression that our whole civilization has been the achievement only of Jews.” 

― Ludwig von Mises, Omnipotent Government

 

If you read the last sentence of von Mises quote above, it parallels what passes for “wokeness” today.

Replace all the white and whiteness talk with the word Jew or black and step into a time machine back to the 1930s in Germany or the American South respectively and things ring very familiar. Imagine that we live in a world where the pigmentation that happens to coincide with Christendom, expanded human freedom in commerce and most scientific advances are systemically racist? The word racist has been bandied about with such abandon and furor it means nothing now.

We can all guess whose skin and gender has no legal protection in the corporate world much less the corridors of government power. Imagine a world in which your entire worldview is set on destruction of the dominant paradigm that you will replace with an economic framework that puts all power in the hands elected and mostly unelected apparatchiks because we all know that free markets can’t deliver bear the death, destruction and poverty that communism can. Communism is for two kinds of people: psychopaths and college graduates. And it always ends the same way without exception. Mass deprivation, starvation, destruction and death and the lies; the mountains of untruth, delusion and constant re-framing of the same fundamental question: why are we so fucked no matter how many regulations, diktats and statistics we manipulate.

Because central planning has never worked. The genius of free markets is the atomization of the answers whether worthy or not in ten of millions of daily decisions made by free men using prices [subjectivist marginalist price theory] to rationally allocate resources and time. Once the bureaucrat destroys that system by employing guns instead of specie, you end up with history’s boneyard (figuratively and literally) of communist and socialist shit-pits extant and dead.

We live in a world whose warp and weft are not intersected but bundled under both real and illusory oppression.

You are not an individual human whose identity is dictated by your pluck, persistence, intelligence, luck and work ethic. You are now merely a meat marionette with a carbon armature whose skin tones and groin tackle determine everything that makes you human.

This may be the latest variant in the ambition to make every human on Earth a more effective widget in the planetary government supremacist ecology.

Welcome to Communism 2.0 or homo Sovieticus beta.

To paraphrase Michael Collins, your refusal is your most powerful weapon. You owe it to your children but I did just pick up a mask in Rhodesian brushstroke.

Prepare accordingly.

“It has often been said that anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools; it would be more accurate to say that socialism is the anti-Semitism of intellectuals…”

― Theodore Dalrymple

“The bottom line, as Raul Hilberg put it, was that most people thought that, even if Jews shouldn’t be killed, they weren’t worth saving.”

― Victoria J. Barnett, Bystanders: Conscience and Complicity During the Holocaust

Brœðr muno beriaz

ok at bǫnom verða,

muno systrungar

sifiom spilla.

Hart er í heimi,

hórdómr mikill.

Skeggǫld, skálmǫld,

skildir ro klofnir.

Vindǫld, vargǫld,

áðr verǫld steypiz.

Mun engi maðr

ǫðrom þyrma.

           

 

Brothers shall fight

and fell each other,

and sisters’ sons

shall kinship stain.

Hard is it on earth,

with rampant whoredom;

Axe-time, sword-time,

shields are splintered.

Wind-time, wolf-time,

ere the world falls.

Nor ever shall men

each other spare.

15 thoughts on “The Unbearable Whiteness of Being by Bill Buppert”

  1. Obedience Mask

    Well worth the read and the quote bonanza at the end was chock full of WIN. Thank you.

    H/T-WRSA

  2. The Mises quote is quite good. I’ve often thought that the current so called “Nazis” are more jealous of the Jew than anything. On the one hand they say the Jews this and the Jews that, but their political, economic, and world alignment are precisely that which they say is bad in a Jew. If the Nazis knew how fiercely prideful and nationalist the Japs are they would hate them too I presume.

    Quote Bonanza indeed. Not really sure where start with making memes from these. I think I should simply tell people to read the article.

  3. Danny formerly known as Donk

    Bill,
    At the risk of having my comment randed as amti-Semite I take issue with some of your precepts. First, your cover photo of the I suppose Jews in prison garb, yes, were systemic atrocities committed by the Germans in WW2? Yes, but not exclusively RE allied firebombing of Dresden and end of war negation of Red Cross missives to POW camps and wholesale rape and slaughter of German regulars and civilians. I will never pretend to be as well read as you but I try to keep up. David Irving’s meticulous research as well as http://www.unz.com articles are enlightening. I am a devout disciple of Christ and strive to harbor no hate for any man. That said, people do evil things and sometimes peoples do this as part of their culture. Jews of modernity are not my monotheistic brethren – it is historical fact.

    I really never understood why John the Baptist and Jesus spoke the way they did to the Pharisees until I researched the Talmudic doctrine. Also, your slight against the South I cannot abide. The WoNA was not about slavery as a single issue. Read Thomas Dilorenzo or Lochlain Seachrest or even Paul Craig Roberts. To say that the South had a singular franchise on slavery is simply historically inaccurate and frankly naive. The story of the KKK is nuanced viewed in the light of Reconstruction policies, disenfranchisment of the white Southern vote and the real black on white terror that occurred not unlike what we see now a la Colin Flaherty and even Dalrymple who you site in your post. To be clear, I ref my earlier statement that I sincerely try not to hate any man because of who he is. I do abide by the principle I taught my chilluns that the window to a man’s soul is measured by what he does. I am still down with your precepts of guvmint bad sans God ordained and measureable outcomes. Yahweh’s Shalom on you and thank you for your thoughtful consideration of my thumb typed missive.

    1. Danny, the comments in your reply are accurate and well said. The war of northern aggression was never about slavery as you pointed out. Unfortunately, anyone that has passed through government schools believes this nonsense. Hopefully, someday the government schools (indoctrination centers) will be defunded. The majority teachers that I know are all hardcore international socialist / communist. Best regards.

      1. Bucko and Danny,

        My children have Stonewall Jackson’s blood in their veins thanks to my bride who is a blood relative. A pox on both houses in the War of Northern Aggression. Please show me in the thirteen states Ordinances of Secession where the preservation of chattel slavery is not the number one concern. Eight of the thirteen are explicit. By all rights, the Union was a house of cards that deserved to be dismembered but it is disingenuous to think slavery was not a big part. Lincoln was a tyrannical monster but the South responded in a fashion that simply aided his campaign to destroy individual liberty in American and put us all on the plantation.

        Example [SC]:

        The General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution.

        Logically, can you articulate what exactly they used states rights to defend if not slavery, asking for a friend.

        There is no cause of the Civil War which did not have to do with slavery or was not inextricably linked to slavery. Read Alexander Stephens’ “Cornerstone” speech. He states plainly that the foundational ideas of the confederacy were black inequality and black slavery.

        I scratch my head at right thinking people making excuses for the horrific excesses of the Democratic Party in the South in the 19th century.

        For a detailed examination of every Ordinance: https://blog.independent.org/2017/08/18/southern-state-seceded-from-the-union-to-protect-slavery/

        I also recommend Higgs: https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=1161

        This review of Hummel: https://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?id=419

        I highly recommend you listen to ProfCJ’s magisterial treatment of the WoNA from an anarcho-capitalist perspective.

        http://profcj.org/ep170/

        1. Bill,

          Well put.

          In years past, largely when I held onto minarchism, I gave a free pass to much of the Southern government and plantation class. I soon realized that neither were commendable in any manner.

          It has been said that the reasons for secession largely revolved around slavery issues, and in fact, despite popular myth that the South was ALL about nullification, one of the big grievances of the time was refusal of some northern states to enforce the fugitive slave law. It is also true that the invasion of the South was largely revolving around Lincoln’s infatuation with the Bloody Union and central state rule of the entire country.

          Pox on both their houses.

  4. The Nazis fought the Communists/Antifa on the streets of Germany and later on the battlefield. Meanwhile America fought with them against the German National Socialism. Capitalism (in its late stage) and Communism are both globalist and centralized in character. Thus they united against Nationalism then as they do now.

    Conclusion: You’re a pretty silly person.

    1. Show your work, you contend that national socialism is the opposite of communism and capitalism and that the government controls in Nazi ideology are significantly different than communist central planning. Looking forward to your evidence.

      Hitler:

      We are socialists. We are enemies of today’s capitalistic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions. [1927]

      …that the individual should come to realize that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of his nation; that the position of the individual ego is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a whole … that above all the unity of a nation’s spirit and will are worth far more than the freedom of the spirit and will of an individual … [W]e understand only the individual’s capacity to make sacrifices for the community, for his fellow man’. [1933]

      I have learned a great deal from Marxism as I do not hesitate to admit … The difference between [Marxists] and myself is that I have really put into practice what these peddlers and pen-pushers have timidly begun. The whole of National Socialism is based on it. Look at the workers’ sports clubs, the industrial cells, the mass demonstrations, the propaganda leaflets written specially for the comprehension of the masses: all these new methods of political struggle are essentially Marxist in origin. All I had to do is take over these methods and adapt them to our purpose. [1941]

      German historian and political scientist Götz Aly points out,

      The National Socialist German Workers’ Party was propagating two age-old dreams of the German people: national and class unity. That was the key to the Nazi popularity, from which they derived the power they needed to pursue their criminal aims. The idea of the Volkstaat – a state of and for the people – was what we would call a welfare state for Germans with the proper racial pedigree. In one of his central pronouncements, Hitler promised “the creation of a socially just state,” a model society that would “continue to eradicate all social barriers.

      In the clash between Social Democrats, Communists and Nazis, writes Richard Pipes:

      Moscow consistently favored the Nazis over the Social Democrats, whom it called ‘social Fascists’ and continued to regard as its principal enemy. In line with this reasoning, it forbade the German Communists to collaborate with the Social Democrats. In the critical November 1932 elections to the Reichstag (Parliament), the Social Democrats won over 7 million votes and the Communists 6 million: their combined votes exceeded the Nazi vote by 1.5 million. In terms of parliamentary seats, they gained between them 221, against the Nazi 196. Had they joined forces, the two left-wing parties would have defeated Hitler at the polls and prevented him from assuming the chancellorship. It thus was the tacit alliance between the Communists and the National Socialists that destroyed democracy in Germany and brought Hitler to power.

      Friedrich Hayek recounts:

      The connection between socialism and nationalism in Germany was close from the beginning. It is significant that the most important ancestors of National-Socialism — Fitche, Rodbertus, and Lassalle — are at the same time acknowledged fathers of socialism … From 1914 onwards there arose from the ranks of Marxist socialism one teacher after another who led, not the conservatives and reactionaries, but the hardworking labourer and idealist youth into the national-socialist fold. It was only thereafter that the tide of nationalist socialism attained major importance and rapidly grew into the Hitlerian doctrine. The war hysteria of 1914, which, just because of the German defeat, was never fully cured, is the beginning of the modern development which produced National-Socialism, and it was largely with the assistance of old socialists that it rose during this period.

  5. I just want to be left alone….I’ve been a productive tax slave for 40 years now, my lifetime chit running somewhere north of $10mil. Why can’t that buy me solitude? Because there are enough men and especially women inherently evil and filled with a lust for power, for whom my annual tribute is inadequate. For whom my independent, contrary thoughts are a threat. For whom my chomping at the bit of control is an annoyance For whom my rational, objective outlook is enraging.

    They will never leave us alone. They will never stop. They never have, until they are room temperature. That’s the mental hurdle that must be cleared. Once done, resolve becomes crystal clear.

      1. Hypocrisy runs deep with you, young Bill. Hells bells boy, the South just wanted to be left alone and look what happened. Dishonest Abe could have let them be, but no. Lincoln started the war BECAUSE he wanted to preserve the UNION (not slavery) AND besides he needed the income from the tariff the Yankees passed on southern exported goods. Where did THAT money go? Why to support Yankee industrialists, of course. See DiLorenzo. Further, Lincoln viewed the Constitution as an “unbreakable contract”, which of course it NEVER was and like any good American Tyrant he cared not one whit for the Bill of Rights. I’m sure you and I will disagree but my reading of the Constitution allows for any state to leave the union, as the states were sovereign and could revoke their rights given to the Federal Govt at any time.

        Lincoln did NOT view slavery as an issue to justify his invasion. It was only AFTER the battle of Antietam that he decided to use slavery as a reason for CONTINUING the war. I invite you to read Lincoln’s FIRST inaugural address. You are correct in your “deep study” of the Confederate Articles of Secession in that 8 of 13 mentioned the institution of slavery as the MAIN grievance for separation, but what of the other 4? What did they say was their reason for secession? This means over 1/3 of the Confederacy seceded and slavery was NOT their main grievance. So whether you like it or not it wasn’t JUST about slavery. Was it a big part? Sure, but it wasn’t the whole story and you know it but continue to deny it. You can believe that “slavery is the only thing” brainwashing if you like, but it just proves your brainwashing by the leviathan education system. I’m sure we can agree that history is ALWAYS written by the winners and the winners ALWAYS make it look favorable for their position. As you know, it was the British Kings who actually set up slavery in the colonies and the Yankee slave ships of NY, CT and RI which made FORTUNES and proved more than helpful in bringing in slaves to the colonies for the King. For the record there were many Southern slave owners who didn’t like slavery and wanted to get rid of it in a “proper” manner such that a situation like the Haitian slave revolt did not happen in the South. So there was a movement in the South to end slavery but it wasn’t nearly as strong as the landed plantation owners pro slavery position.

        As for the KKK there has been several “iterations” of it but the FIRST iteration can be defended based on the conditions in the South during “reconstruction”. Sadly I doubt you even know what happened in the south during reconstruction. For my family it was a horror enforced by a Yankee occupying army. Do I expect you to even care about the atrocities of reconstruction? No, as I’m sure your argument goes something along the lines of “well, they lost”. My great great grandfather died at Vicksburg so for me U.S. Grant is just another POS. And by the way my GGGF did NOT own slaves he just wanted to be left alone but it was not to be.

        Had the South won their war for independence do you think there would STILL be slavery in the Confederate states over 150 years later? I say no because the industrial revolution would have made slavery uneconomical over time and the South would have had to switched to a mechanized manner for agrarian production out of sheer economy of scale. Would the Confederate States of America have worked out better than the “United States of Yankeedom”? I don’t know but they had the natural right to try without being further enslaved by dishonest Abe and his “forced” UNION. Every year I have toast on John Wilkes Booth birthday in praise for the man who shot “Lincoln the invader”.

        I’m sure I haven’t changed your mind on anything one iota. And nothing you will write in response will change my mind one iota. We will have to amicably disagree. But if I ever find myself in a situation to help in your defense (kinetically of course) I’m happy to do so. My best to your lovely wife and tell her that if given the chance I’d sure like to talk to her about her family tree over a beer OK maybe she likes wine. As for your family tree… meh, but I’m sure we can always talk rifles. 🙂

        All the best to you and yours.

        /r
        Grey Ghost

        1. Grey Ghost,

          You don’t have to convince me the North and Lincoln was evil, I have that well in hand but I find fault with both sides when it comes to human slavery. The South practiced a more direct kind of bondage while Lincoln and his Marxian Grand Old Politburo created a system that literally penalized you for success in direct taxation along with the introduction of conscription which is a more sophisticated term for uniformed bondage. You are correct that Lincoln did not use the pretext of slavery but the South did from the start.

          And by the way I don’t think the slavery was the only issue but it was certainly preeminent, plenty of just complaints on unfair and disproportionate taxation of Southern products by the scoundrels in the North.

          Per Yankee involvement in the slave trade, they bore the brunt of the shipping, happily.

          I don’t mean to change your mind but I simply see no side to cheer for in the unpleasantness in the 1860-65 and the horrendous blow to liberty for everyone with Reconstruction and the 13th and 14th Amendment, the former stops chattel slavery and the latter puts everyone on the plantation.

          A gentleman’s disagreement, GG and I would love not only to chat about firearms but go to the range. Hypocrisy is a strong word but I’ll chalk that to getting your blood up. I would like to suggest you are a model of comity and gentlemanly comportment and always welcome on my porch and around my “cracker barrel”.

          I condemn both sides’ political behavior.

          Cordially,

          Bill

  6. Pingback: The Unbearable Whiteness of Being by Bill Buppert | NC Renegades

  7. Many thanks, Bill. I was captive to a false dichotomy for over 50 years: support the lesser of two evils, Yankees or Southerners. Both were evil. This is truly liberating.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top