Disarm! No, Your Move by Bill Buppert

“All political authority comes from the barrel of a gun.”

– Zombie Chairman Mao

“To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens.”
– Zombie Adolf Hitler

“One man with a gun can control 100 without one.”  

“The goal of socialism is communism.”

– Zombie Vladimir Lenin

“If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves.”
– Zombie Josef Stalin

Publisher’s Note: PSA from The Amphibian on 2/28/2018, Rezident Trump: “I like taking the guns early … Take the guns first, go through due process second.”

Meanwhile, knife crime is on the rise in the Fabian communist paradise quaintly known to most as the United Kingdom.

I have changed my Kindle book prices on Amazon to 3.08 and 3.38 respectively in homage to the current weapons prohibition offensive by the government supremacists in yet another jeremiad against the fundamental prerogative of all free-range humans, self-defense against initiated violence.-BB

The fundamental questions are all wrong in the weapons prohibition debate.

“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.”
– Jeff Cooper, Art of the Rifle

The recent demonstration of badged cowardice and institutional incompetence by the various armed fat boy (there’s a reason why police uniform suppliers make production pants with a 60 inch waist) fraternities chartered by the local thugs-in-government showcased the drama that is the state.

The state herds the young skulls full of malleable clay into Marxist indoctrination camps for three fourths of the year to train the mentally handicapped to be more so and ensure any independent thinkers are rooted out and dealt with.

A young man (19), mostly likely drugged out on school-prescribed SSRI drugs, buys a number of weapons through the government background check system at a local BATFE field office fronted as a gun store. He

Read this transcript of a timeline published in a local rag in FL. Also please note that Cruz had no father in the house since 2012 under his adoptive mother.

The badged Orcs had known of these issues for nearly five years.

Evil is as evil does.

The entire vaunted “law imposement” system failed from the local to the Federal level. I suspect the FBI was just like any other giant police bureaucracy and had other more important matters to pursue like Russian ghost hunts, sports betting, college, sports bribery schemes,

I have spent years documenting the gross and massive incompetence, grueling sadism and overtly political nature of the American “just-us” system and its army of badged thugs praying on hapless taxpayers across the country on this blog.

I have spent the same amount of time documenting the consistent and systematic erosion of private weapons ownership.

No political party in America is friendly to the private ownership of weapons.

You will note that no political party has ever advanced the notion of restricting the possession of weapons by the government.

The reason these violence brokers posing as statesman want you disarmed is elegantly simple.

Your money is not enough.

Your compliance is not enough.

Your allegiance is not enough.

Until you are craven, prostrated and every human transaction you broker is totally controlled by the state, nothing will sate the hunger of the government supremacists.

In the end, without total obeisance, they want you dead and buried. Most likely in a mass grave with thousands of other enemies of the state. There is a reason that failure to comply always has deadly consequences even for seatbelt violations.

The communist utopia demands nothing less and the historical body count could probably ring the entire planet with a morbid corpse bracelet circling the globe.

According to the Census data, there are more than 87,000 local and state governments constituting more than 511,000 offices.

There are probably about one million badged and armed government Orcs in the USA.

Federal, state and local governments employ 22.2 million workers nationwide, equaling 16.7 percent of the U.S. workforce of 132.7 million. Almost 30,000 rank-and-file government employees make over $190,823, more than any governor of the 50 states, according to a report from OpenTheBooks.com.

The remainder are dirt people distributed along a curve of loyalty to the collectivist program from a majority to a tiny minority in the single digit percentage points that want little or no government at all.

You are surrounded.

Make your plans appropriately.

The festivities on 19 April in 1775 were started by a British government expedition into the colonial reaches of its British citizenry in North America to seize privately held artillery, rifles, pistols, munitions, powder and all the accoutrements of protection germane to a frontier lifestyle in the 18th century.

I have made no reference to the Second Amendment, it is a dead letter and holds no juridical value hence the “Constitutionality” of every robed government employees injunction against the private ownership of weapons.

Not that the 2A is worth the paper it’s printed on. The 2A is a sham to protect weapons ownership. It has no teeth whatsoever. If it did, how could the 1934 NFA, 1938 FFA, the decision in US v. Miller in 1939, 1968 GCA, Nixon’s pogrom against handguns, the 1986 FOPA, Bushevik I’s ban on foreign cosmetically offensive weapons in 1989, the NICs, the AWB all the way to the conservative zombie Scalia’s Leninist bromide about “dangerous and unusual weapons”. On and on and on.

The government has a message for your “right” to keep and bear arms: Fuck You, Helot.

Make your peace and remember that Newton’s Third Law isn’t merely ironclad but a mother-fuckin’ serial killer.

Cold dead fingers is piss-poor planning.

Steel your heart to the coming storm on the horizon.

Your children would be disappointed otherwise.

What will you leave them?

Resist. Rinse. Repeat.

“…[T]o restrain [evil men] by their sense of humanity is the same as to stop a runaway horse with a bridle of silk thread.”
– Walter Scott, Ivanhoe

From Zombie Fidel Castro’s communist address of January 9, 1959:

 I appeal to the public to disarm the ambitious. Why are clandestine arms being stored at this very minute? Why are arms being hidden at distinct points of the capital? Why are arms being smuggled at this moment? I tell you that there are members of certain revolutionary organizations who are smuggling and storing arms. All the arms that were found by the rebel army are stored and locked in barracks, where they belong. What are these arms for? Against whom are they going to be used?

Against the revolutionary government that has the support of all the people? Do we have a dictatorship here? Are we going to take up arms against a free government that respects the rights of the people? We have a free country here. We have no censorship, and the press is free. The people can gather freely if they want to. There is no tormenting of political prisoners, no murders, no terror. When all the rights of the citizens have been restored–and an election for the purpose is going to be held as soon as possible–why do we need arms? Are we going to unseat the President with the arms? Are we going to set up revolutionary organizations? Are we going to have gangsters?

Are we going to practice daily shooting on the streets of the capital? Why do we need arms? Yet I tell you here and now that two days ago elements of certain organizations broke into the San Antonio barracks, which are under the jurisdiction of Commander Camilo Cienfuegos and also under my jurisdiction as commander in chief of the armed forces, and carried away 500 small arms, (16?) machine guns, and 80,000 cartridges. I wanted to tell you about this and make use of the influence exerted by public opinion so that those who are planning any criminal adventure will not be able to recruit any troops to follow them. The theft of the weapons cannot be justified, because this is not a dictatorship. We are never going to use force, because we belong to the people. Moreover, the day that the people do not want us we shall leave. As soon as possible I will take the rifles off the streets. There are no more enemies, there is no longer anything to fight against, and if some day any foreigner or any movement comes up against the revolution, all the people will fight. The weapons belong in the barracks. No one has the right to have private armies here.


23 thoughts on “Disarm! No, Your Move by Bill Buppert”

  1. Pingback: Buppert: Disarm! No – Your Move… | Western Rifle Shooters Association

  2. I am not a lawyer but isn’t it illegal for Walmart & Dick’s to deny long gun sales to under-21s? If not then why not be able to deny sales to (theoretically) suspect minorities?

    1. I understand exactly what you are saying but the interpretation of law always favors the expansion of government power. The robed government employees know where their bread is buttered.

    2. Race is, de jure, a suspect category. As is religion, sex, etc.

      Age is not.

      They are free to do that if they chose.

      Private business is not the government, and they can set higher standards than the state on anything, all the way to refusing to sell anything to anyone if they so chose.

      They are also free to have a backlash boycott broken off in their tailpipe for doing that.

      Freedom cuts both ways.

        1. As a person of libertarian philosophy and an advocate of non-violent communication [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_Communication ], I was disheartened and taken aback by the use of the crude euphemisms that were meant, I believe, to hurt, belittle and denounce the person who wanted to buy a cake from a Christian baker but, because of the baker’s belief that homosexuality was ‘sinful’, would not sell the homosexual a cake.

          I was saddened, not because the baker refused to sell a cake – he had every right not to do so – but because some of those who agreed with the baker chose to use slurs and insults instead of producing the simple facts for why the baker had a right to choose what they did.

          The world is filled too much with man’s-inhumanity-to-man to add to such inhumanity. The baker never abrogated any of the rights of the homosexual, and the homosexual, unfortunately, tried to use the FORCE of law to ‘punish’ the baker. But if we want any of the parties, or witnesses to the goings on, to understand why what the homosexual did was wrong, I believe the best way is not to use sarcasm and inflammatory rhetoric, and anger, but, rather, to state plainly and simply why we feel the homosexual was wrong in trying to use FORCE against the baker.

          If we promote hostility that makes it almost impossible for another person to look at themselves and their actions in a neutral manner and be open to retrospection and the ability to question their motives and actions. What good teacher first shames and belittles and calls their students names in order to instruct them in whatever subject they want to teach?! The chances of changing another person’s viewpoint may not be 100% by using the ‘honey’ method but there is almost no chance using ‘vinegar’. What do you think?

    1. Indeed, no government can exist a day without committing acts of terror to keep its tax plantation Helots in line…

  3. The remainder are dirt people distributed along a curve of loyalty to the collectivist program from a majority to a tiny minority in the single digit percentage points that want little or no government at all.

    The single digit minority of libertarians will remain a small minority. To win they need to invent a technological force multiplier of at least thirty.

    1. That last time, the British aristocracy was displaced by a new American aristocracy. The same perceived legitimacy to rule was merely transferred to a different set of rulers. The power structure was unchanged, except for the names like “house of lords” renamed to “senate”. It only occurred at all because the Atlantic ocean was expensive terrain to supply an army across, not because the colonial militaries were better. I score this a draw for freedom.

    1. So are your thoughts here, they have a value of zero.

      Any substantive arguments available from you, Helot? Would love to hear your thoughts on the virtue of weapons prohibition.

      Maybe you can get some of your slack-jawed non-binary colleagues to give us a rhetorical thrashing on the joys of government supremacism.

  4. The Walkin' Dude

    Chilling, the “pleading” from that silver tongue devil, Castro. They always beg for your support while they gut you.

  5. I’m sitting on the edge of my seat knowing that a social convulsion is about to take place. There’ll be a fine line between defense and offense.

  6. Fifty years ago this week, the city of Hue was liberated from North Vietnamese forces by United States Marines.

    According to Wiki, “During the months and years that followed the Battle of Huế, which began on January 31, 1968, and lasted a total of 28 days, dozens of mass graves were discovered in and around Huế. The estimated death toll was between 2,800 to 6,000 civilians and prisoners of war. Victims were found bound, tortured, and sometimes apparently buried alive. . ”

    Per Mike Vanderboegh, RIP, “Always remember that this is the true face of collectivism. Behind the lying smiles and soothing words, the only definition of ‘peace’ that collectivists of any stripe agree upon is when all their political enemies are dead or in prison. Remember the victims of Hue, 1968. And never, ever, believe that collectivism is anything other than a death cult.”

    “The difference between a communist and socialist is that a socialist is a communist who has not found his AK-47 and the will to use it, and a communist is a socialist with an AK-47 who IS ready to use it.”


  7. Pingback: Some Items You Might Find Interesting – Dirt People

  8. “No political party in America is friendly to the private ownership of weapons.”:

    it is my understanding that the libertarian party is not included in that statement..

    1.9 Self-Defense

    The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right – RECOGNIZED – by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense. Private property owners should be free to establish their own conditions regarding the presence of personal defense weapons on their own property. We oppose all laws at any level of government restricting, registering, or monitoring the ownership, manufacture, or transfer of firearms or ammunition.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top