Why the Movie Studies and Record Companies Want to Kill Youtube – SOPA Ain’t What You Think It Is! By Jim March

The “Stop Online Piracy Act”, if passed, will allow “content owners” (studios, TV networks and record labels mainly) to order entire websites taken down if anybody posts “pirated content” there or even links to same. With so many videos being uploaded to Youtube and the like, monitoring or pre-approving videos is impossible and Google is on record as saying this bill will kill off Youtube completely.

The existing piracy controls are bad enough: the “content owners” can issue take-down notices when they spot piracy, but as long as Youtube or the like takes the stuff down (barring a counter-notification), Youtube can’t be held legally responsible.

The classic role of the record companies going back to the first years of rock was to sign up a good bar band, lock ’em into a ghastly contract, get ’em radio time, promote the hell out of their album(s), get ’em concerts and pay them a relative pittance for the first few years. That was the norm.

That norm is breaking down because via Youtube and the like, brand new artists can connect directly with their audiences. The artist makes more money off of google adsense than they would as an obscure act on a large label, they can sell direct on iTunes or the like and they also sell CDs directly. Via the tracking on Youtube for number of views they build proof of their audience – which leads to either concert gigs and/or a contract with a record label that doesn’t rape them.

This is exactly what Justin Beiber did.

Here’s some other examples – pay attention to the number of views:

Ronald Jenkees  – almost 8 million hits on that one song and over a quarter mil subscribers to his channel.

Andy McKee  – 42 million views! He’s signed with a small label specializing in acoustic/folk, which is probably a much better deal than a major label.

This sort of thing is pure poison if you’re one of the execs at a big parasitic label. SOPA is how you stop it.

And it’s not just music – the same model is now breaking over into movies. The classic case so far is Freddiew – ever week he does a 2min or so video (usually “action”) and puts it on his Youtube channel, like so: Whose gun is it, anyway?

He has almost 3 million subscribers, over 500 million video views. He’s making enough cash off of google ads to pay himself and at least two others a full-time salary, plus finance the making of a full-length movie (in progress). He’s also gotten big enough to do web ads for the Battlefield games and did a spin-off of “Cowboys And Aliens” featuring the director of same.

In 10 years it’s a dead cinch Freddie will be directing more and better full-blown movies. No question. Will there be a studio as his “master”? I’d bet against it! He might well cut deals with direct-to-online outlets like Hulu, or sell exclusive-for-a-while rights to anybody from Netflix to DirecTV, and later break out completely into theaters.

THIS is the threat the major media sees out of Youtube – not piracy! They want to remain parasites between the artists and audience and will stop at nothing to prevent that…and they’ve bought off enough federal legicritters to be a threat to do it.

Note that this isn’t just “me talking” – researchers as highly placed as Harvard U are coming to very similar conclusions, at least as far as music goes.

PS: there is an alternate theory going around as to SOPA’s real ends that I think has some weight, but for reasons I’ll explain I think my theory is the more “dominant”. The other line of thinking is that “the powers that be” don’t like how much exposure of government abuses are being played on Youtube and the like.

I think this is a lesser factor, and might explain some quiet push being put on some of the legislators in the back rooms from the US-DOJ or the like. But it does not explain the fervent effort being put forward by all of the major media players in the music and movie industries. We know that’s where most of the money and lobbying for SOPA is coming from and again, this obvious connection between Youtube and the direct artist-to-audience links is a terrifying thing – for the parasites.

3 thoughts on “Why the Movie Studies and Record Companies Want to Kill Youtube – SOPA Ain’t What You Think It Is! By Jim March”

  1. If Google would simply get creative they can stop this in its tracks. for example, if for one week, every time you logged into facebook, a screen would come up with “This site has been removed by the US Government.” That screen would last for a few seconds and be replaced with another that says “Don’t let this happen to YouTube. Call your Congressman today and oppose SOPA!” then the number of the person’s congressman based on the computer’s IP address. then after a few seconds, the screen goes to youtube. I believe within a week, Congress will be SO overwhelmed with calls flooding in, that SOPA will be a dead issue.

  2. Pingback: … Will someone please just give us the “facts” … full disclosure … where’s Sgt Joe Friday when we need him … « Authentically Wired

  3. Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to offer our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy. So, please take my advice and attain out to an expert photographer. So, how are you able to stop potential dates from monitoring your digital footprint? “If you are not careful, potential love pursuits, and fraudsters alike, can find information about your life – all leaving you weak. How are you able to prevent someone from finding private information by means of different web sites? In case your courting profile easily leads matches to your different social media pages, you may be by accident sharing extra info than you’re comfy with. Which means the app has confirmed the particular person in the profile photograph to be a genuine consumer and can show a blue checkmark to affirm this, similar to platforms comparable to Twitter or Instagram. Messages escalate rapidly from “getting to know you” to “professions of love,” and they fight to maneuver issues off the site or app and onto e mail or one other communication platform after just a handful of exchanges. In accordance with a notice issued by the Federal Trade Commission, an operator has precise information of a person’s age if the site or service asks for-and receives-information from the consumer that allows it to determine the person’s age.

    Some on-line courting services have been designed particularly to reap the benefits of features on smartphones and use the person’s location and smartphone gestures. It seems to have influenced teenage Gen Z males to remain single throughout their highschool years. Not solely will we arrange dates with all of the intriguing native males you can’t wait to fulfill, we’ll additionally get solutions to your most burning questions – like job standing, youngsters, training level, and so forth. You’ll stroll into each date assured that you’re meeting somebody real, who meets all your perfect partner criteria. If this is your first foray into on-line courting, or you’re diving into the local single’s scene once more after an extended relationship, it could appear overwhelming, discouraging, even slightly scary. “If you suspect somebody is trying to steal your id, contact your local or [url=https://onlinedatingreviews1.quora.com/Get-Matched-with-Quality-Slavic-Beauty-CharmDate-Review-2025]charmdate.com[/url] nationwide legislation enforcement company to file a report that your identification has been stolen.

    5. “If you’re chatting with me and we have now too much in frequent and you like me, let me know. However, you also needs to remember of the results the breach might have had already. However, there’s no strict rule. However, these arguments have been challenged and the present consensus is that upholding an abstract idea of the rule of legislation was not “the predominant consideration” of the Athenian authorized system. There are just a few signs the no contact rule is working that you may home in on when you are attempting this on your previous relationship. As there were many hands on deck throughout a change of the watch, it would be an opportune moment for the ship’s pilot to order a change in bearing (if needed). When you should still stumble throughout just a few, having to pay for a subscription with a purpose to alternate messages helps reduce down on the variety of pretend profiles.

    According to the safety firm, almost a 3rd of Brits aged 16-35 have had their on-line relationship account hacked, with over a quarter of those users extorted for money and 23% having discovered their identities stolen. What steps can you are taking to re-secure your account? It’s a web-based dating precaution you need to all the time take earlier than you change messages with somebody new. After you met on the internet, it’s best to instantly go to the part of meetings. If you’re not sure the man you met on-line is real, do a reverse picture search on his profile images to see in the event that they pop up elsewhere on the web. A reverse image search takes solely seconds. An alternative choice is to do a reverse image search in your match’s profile image to see whether or not it matches up with any other on-line profiles. 3. Look on the search results to see if there are other comparable images. There is no such thing as a must ramble. The quote above is from an Australian girl who was scammed, and reported it to officials there.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top