“Fuck You, That’s Why”: A New American Chapter by Bill Buppert

I’d like to suggest the soundtrack for the new America that is emerging.

I’ve covered my thoughts on rule of law, obedience and refusal unto death to not comply. These are the building blocks to create systems that stymie the political control of human beings.

My interest in politics is always a matter of self-defense. Politics is nothing more than a sophisticated way to describe a violence system that uses coercion through threat and force to steal from its geographical inhabitants and regulate every aspect of their lives. It molds society through sheer naked aggression and blood lust; a willingness to kill a subject for violating a seatbelt law or not obeying a badged Praetorian in the pay of the state.

And politicians are violence brokers and nothing more. There is no such thing as a statesman, a mythic fiction foisted by court historians through the ages to champion their country’s psychopaths in suit and tie.

There are a number of factors that make this possible. The factory school cartel controlled by the government is a key element of the imperial conditioning process that encourages humans to be so susceptible to the weird and odd hybrid of the Stockholm Syndrome and Milgram experiment that makes Western countries so unbearable.

The latest political circus has finally proven beyond a shadow of a doubt the kabuki theater that is the “two party” system in America; a mere flimsy superstructure to the Deep State that actually controls the vast plantation entity that is the US.

I find Trump just as obnoxious as the harridan from the Clinton crime family but do enjoy the fuck you attitude of the vote for Trump. Most don’t seem to realize that changing the meat puppets in DC does not a change make. But many are waking up to the reeking stink of corruption that is the entire collectivist swamp of Mordor on the Potomac. The leviathan will continue apace and the government will simply get bigger and more intrusive.

The non-aggression principle holds that no initiated aggression through force or fraud is moral and may demand reciprocal violence to stymie the threat or actual use of violence.

This is not pacifism, this is life as we know it. Pacifism is a sure-fire path to extinction for all its practitioners.

But the government keeps pushing and hitting and stealing. Pushing.

Mr. Smith at The Captains Journal adroitly nails this conceit and he straps it to the wall. He handily dissects the latest email conversation where the women of both sexes plot to disarm the populace in America.

The latest Wikileaks (thank you, Mr. Assange for your service to the cause of freedom) release on the DNC emails shows an interesting string of Podesta emails talking to one of his hoplophobic sycophants about disarming the Helots to make way for the next phase in the march to Stalinist America.

Read the whole thing.

It reveals the mind of the bearded pajama boys playing at being tough revolutionaries like dead Che whose 49th death anniversary I celebrated on Sunday when he was hunted down by my colleagues in 8th Special Forces Group (Airborne) [subsumed into 7th SFGA in 1972].

It’s all happened before.

By the way, this Christmas will be the anniversary of the charming Ceausescu power couple being ushered across the River Styx in 1989. Keep that in your prayers for this Christmas and remember the Gods do sometimes frown on the politicians.

So when you look at the rear view mirror of American history you discover time after time where Americans, once British colonials, simply bend to the violent wishes of the central government or its satraps in the states.

The natural reaction to George Washington’s march on the tax protesters in 1794 in Pennsylvania should have been a guerrilla reaction to the national government army trespass with capture and lynching of Washington the moment he arrayed against the tax protesters.

The same applies for the Alien and Seditions Act and the Supremes’ self-appointment as imperial arbiter of the tentacled leviathan in DC in 1803. Time after time these were no different than the intolerant acts by the British government in London before 1775 and the subsequent Congressional over-reach from the criminal syndicate waving colored rags and fomenting war against its own inhabitants.

The fabled westward migration for the next hundred years wasn’t a quaint Disney-esque trek to found the new frontier but an escape mechanism for those who saw the US government for what it was: a Hamiltonian government supremacist orchid-house taking the worst excesses of the ongoing French Revolution and the fundamental tenants of the Roman Empire to craft a new form of mass oppression on the North American continent.

Flash-forward to present day and you’d have to be blind not to see that the Democrats and their Republican clients are nothing more than a vast combine of jobs programs, bureaucracy that never ends and a vicious war machine that makes equal violence on domestic and foreign enemies alike. And the entire trillions dollar enterprise is built on two simple concepts.

Hitting and stealing.

Despite the grandiose buildings, bad speeches, collared rags flapping in the breeze, shabby music and shiny technology; none of it is possible without doing those two simple things. Governments produce nothing that doesn’t result from a combination of theft and violence.

Here’s what makes the system so unique and powerful. Not one politician is ever held to account expect in certain outlier circumstances so the Ceausescus and other political ingrates throughout history who have met an untimely end. I am certain some readers can point to some politicos that have met ends forced upon them and not died comfortably in their beds in mansion built on stolen loot.

We’ve chatted before about how police necessarily exist since they are the spear point of all political will; they are among the most unaccountable for their poor and lethal behavior.

But politicians take this immunity to an incredibly absurd level. The only just war is one fought to defend your country from invasion or to defeat domestic political usurpers. Since war is primarily disputes between plantation owners in all other cases, the politician tends to gravitate to the shivering of swords and rattle of sabers, not participating tin the conflicts they start of course. One can make a very firm case that f anyone is a combatant in wartime it is the political class but the darlings have made sure to enshrine their protection as non-combatants in the conflicts they create sacrosanct and the sheep just follow merrily along.

What would happen if combatant status were granted to politicians instantly? Would it dis-incentivize the rush of old men to extinguish young man in forgotten neo-imperialist shitpits around the globe?

Which brings us to the core of this essay, what is the moral response to the total absence of accountability for those who erect a system without direct consent on the inhabitants of a geographical area? What is the level of tolerance one must bear before striking back in self-defense?

What would the landscape of political zealotry and boosterism look like if politicians were held to the same standards they impose on the Helots they rule over? What would happen if hitting and stealing were actioned the same way the vast number of bipedal sheep are sheared in America on a daily basis?

Let’s step outside the box and ask ourselves some Socratic questions.

  • If I come in your house and burgle your wealth and goods every month and then stick a gun in your face if you try to stop me, is that right? What if I steal more simply because you object?
  • If you pay off that house and own it outright (from the banks) but refuse to pay the king his assessment, he has the right to seize it for pennies on the dollar?
  • If you happen to use or cultivate a plant banned by your betters, you should potentially lose everything including your freedom?
  • If I grope your body and genitalia or worst yet forcibly remove your bodily fluids whether with a doctor or not, is that right?
  • What if your neighbor decided to sell parts of unborn babies cannibalized by a quasi-government business, profit by it and force your to underwrite it?
  • What if you decided to educate your own children but your were still forced at gunpoint to subsidize the destruction of the minds of other urchins whose parents were too immoral or lazy to educate their own?

On and on.

Is there no trespass that deserves to be resisted? Is there anything an American politician can do that would drive Americans to do the right thing? The American political landscape has become so thoroughly Sovietized and built on the totalitarian notion of law and order enforced by those who don’t police their own ranks.

And here’s a thought experiment: if a cop mauls a relation of yours for no good reason, which is most of the time, what is your obligation to revenge and remuneration? I always marvel at the videos and accounts of various badged Orcs mauling women, just the women, and wonder where the fuck the male relatives are. What would you do if your wife, sister or daughter had her face broken or was sexually assaulted by a state employee?

You’ll notice the whole legal system in America is built on hitting and stealing as long as zero private arbitration of abuse is practiced. Transparency is in one direction and it ain’t yours.

Self–defense may be the most primal and basic of all notions of human conduct in groups. Murder begins where self-defense ends and government always turns that on its head.

There is much mewling and caterwauling by the usual suspects in the media and their sycophant mouthpieces in the police bureaucracies of a war on cops in a Lewis Carroll world where police violence is civilization and defending yourself against such government hooliganism is barbarism.

Interesting times indeed.

Only the government you have not formally consented to can do as it pleases when it comes to the unlimited dispensation of violence and justification thereof. Many bloviations has been granted to the recent screed about the “Flight 93” nature of the present contest for the Offal Office and everyone misses the implication of the conjecture.

That cockpit should have been rushed in 1787 when the central government cabal was crafting the noose around the necks of all the patriots who had wrested control of their lives from London and granted it to themselves again. Most of those Machiavellian miscreants knew that a political coup would be necessary to put a gun in the hands of the national state.

America is not a free country and I can no more suggest the morally defensible answer to this than a Helot could in ancient Sparta on pain of death.

But we cannot speak that answer’s name.

Polite conversation allows me to posit that secession is the only answer, individual or otherwise. This makes some politicos fill their pants.

Go to the range and triage your preparation for the sporty times ahead.

Resistance is fertile and may be coming sooner than you think. Make peace with this mortal coil.

By the way, turn off your fucking television.

Spartacus is coming…

Colin Ryan has a message and if you’re reading this, you may be part of the solution.

When Men Become Truly Free by Colin Ryan

There comes a times in the lives of men

When the ruthless and the criminally insane

Who rule the masses for their own gain

Make the fatal mistake of enjoying too much

 

Their psychopathic entertainment

They lose control in their lust for blood

And take too far their need to tread men down

By destroying any sense of a secure life

 

And taking away each and every freedom

Stealing the last piece of wealth they possess

So they cannot even care for their own

Stifling their voice with laws and corruption

 

Beating them down with rule by force

Where no justice exists for those being played

And there is no direction left for men to turn

When this insane game is taken this far

 

Comes the time when men have nothing left to lose

This is the time when the minds of men are freed

It is a time when man loses his fear of death

This is the time when a man becomes invincible

 

He becomes free to do whatever he must do

Without fear for his life or for his future

He will take control of the destiny of the world

Away from the bloodied hands of the soulless

 

Any action he takes he will take with a surety

That he must do something for he has no future

So the act he chooses will be all the greater

For when faced with oblivion and with no way out

 

He will take down as many of his oppressors with him

Gladly die in a selfless act to change the world’s future

This day is coming soon as it always does

The perverse minds of evil always self destruct

 

As their addiction to our suffering can never be sated

Exerting control for their paranoia and fear of men

For every good man will take down these brutes

Every free man will give up himself for his brothers

 

For a man with nothing left becomes fully empowered

And he is the most unassailable weapon against evil

Digg thisShare on YummlyShare on TumblrPrint this pageEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookFlattr the authorShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on VKBuffer this page

20 thoughts on ““Fuck You, That’s Why”: A New American Chapter by Bill Buppert

  1. Pingback: TBFY | Western Rifle Shooters Association

  2. Pingback: These sites you visit now: | IowaDawg Musings & More

  3. Nicely written Bill. I find myself in agreement with you a LOT, and I can say we are of a like mind maybe 80% of the time, which is pretty damn high considering my contrarian mind and view of the world. I’m still not down with the abolitionist label as I have real problems with rabid abolitionists. Not that you are rabid, but maybe you can understand my point view. I view 99.9% of modern day abolitionists as rabid and generally intolerant of many ideas required of a free society. As an example, I give you the modern day rabid abolitionism of the politically correct marxists who continually TELL us what is acceptable speech and what is not acceptable speech in a societal “norming” way which totally shuts down discussion of ideas they do not want discussed. Further, being a slavery abolitionist in the U.S. 150 years after the fact is, an easy moral position to take as I don’t think I know anyone who would defend slavery in the 21st century, though I might be able to come close in defending indentured servitude, which I believe I can do from a moral position. Here is a thought experiment… IF you were a plantation and slave owner in 1859 Mississippi (remember slavery was constitutional) would you have fought against the Union invaders to protect your life and property?

    As for me, if I had to be corralled into a label it would be as an anarcho-capitalist rebel. I find myself defending some things now that I could never have defended in the past as I recently finished this: https://mises.org/library/defending-undefendable

    Don’t get me wrong, philosophically I’ll NEVER defend a collectivist or any government so inclined. I suspect this is where we will diverge on self determination and govt, “That government is best which governs least, because its people discipline themselves.” — Thomas Jefferson. An example that comes to mind and is not fully fleshed out goes something like this: THE only things a “central” government should be allowed to do is: 1) Defend the national borders/country WITHIN the borders, using non-standing STATE militias that require ALL men to be armed and trained, and 2) Set and enforce national immigration law. No income tax and No PROPERTY taxes as all men are entitled to the full fruits of their labor. Criminal Law is left to the States/Provinces and is based solely on the non-agression principle, natural law, self-defense, and the Bill of Rights. I think you get the idea, though I suspect you’d respectfully disagree, which is fine.

    At any rate, I really like your blog and it’s bookmarked high on the list to read. In fact, on occasion, I’ve read your posting long before CA posts a link at WRSA. Keep up the great work.

    /r
    Grey Ghost

    • Thanks GG for the kind words, means alot coming from a fellow Southron. As gentlemen, as I said before, we will simply have to disagree on the word abolitionist.

      Further, being a slavery abolitionist in the U.S. 150 years after the fact is, an easy moral position to take as I don’t think I know anyone who would defend slavery in the 21st century, though I might be able to come close in defending indentured servitude,

      That is my point, slavery never vanished, it simply took on more subtle tones and camouflage but remains the same institution. If you can force me to buy healthcare, what stops you from making me pick your cotton in the future?

      But you and I are both an-caps, most certainly.

      I am honored by a readership that counts you among them.

      Email me sometime.

  4. Bill,

    Good article, enjoyed the read. So many things being said about this current election cycle it boggles the mind. I am spending a good bit of time reading all the Wikileaks stuff. Podesta’s emails are all the proof even the most entrenched statist “should” need to wake up to the machine, but it will not. For a multitude of reasons too many to discuss. My biggest concern is getting home before the SHTF. I admit, I prefer to see a Trump before the abomination that is Hillery for that reason alone. It is also pleasing to see a large swath sticking their middle finger in the air to the POLS. They are simply a collections of whores who proudly display their manginas for all to see.

    When is the damn book coming out? Before the fall hopefully.

    /P

    • Phillip,

      Good to hear from you and I agree on all points. You should put together a screed on the Wikileaks emails and I’ll post it here. You’re a brave man to wade through that hot mess.

      Bill

  5. “I always marvel at the videos and accounts of various badged Orcs mauling women, just the women, and wonder where the fuck the male relatives are.”

    I wonder about it too. Perhaps the women in question picked the wrong relatives to have!

    Of course we can guess that the Ministry of Propaganda is going to deep-six any righteous revenge or paint it as something else. I do recall reading of a couple of occasions, years back, where fathers in Massachusetts responded to an attack on their families by the “Child Protection – er, I mean, Kidnapping Services” by killing the social workers involved, so it surely must happen at times.

    I have analyzed the question a while ago with this article:
    http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2010/tle589-20100926-07.html

    Again, things will suddenly look a lot different when the oligarchy finally runs the economy into the ground.

  6. Yep. I am a self-described “benevolent anarchist”, but I still haven’t worked out how to cover national defense, as even properly understood it entails very expensive, complicated systems although there are certainly lessons to be learned from Afghani history. That said, thank you, and Godspeed.

  7. Pingback: Rational Review News Digest, 10/17/16 - Iraq: Regime launches Mosul offensive to drive out Islamic State - Thomas L. Knapp - Liberty.me

  8. I’ve been thinking a lot lately of how everyone that the state actors violate is someone’s loved one. Doesn’t this remove the state actor’s right to complain if someone goes after the state actor’s loved one?

  9. Well said, Bill. We truly live during a time of upheaval.

    “Resistance is fertile and may be coming sooner than you think.”

    I’m often told how the abolition of the state “can never happen in our lifetime” and such things by those that use this excuse to act like obedient sheep and support the state. I retort that the rate of change in society, especially the decay of archaic political institutions, is increasing at an exponential rate. A lot of smug statists are in for quite a surprise in the not to distant future.

  10. Thanks to Old Dog and “A Nation Beguiled”, I have discovered you as a kindred spirit. I could not have written the essay above differently or more succinctly. Thanks! Made my day. I look forward to visiting often in the meantime, mean times indeed these be!

  11. Pingback: “F#@k You, That’s Why” | From the Trenches World Report

  12. I hate the tyranny of the government. I also hate the tyranny of the wealthy and powerful, whose private thugs have killed with impunity so often in the past. Killed by armed security or killed by a nervous cop-you’re still dead.

    A twelve hour work day with every second Sunday off from the mine or the factory doesn’t sound so hot either. The Supreme Court called that “constitutionally protected freedom of contract” for a long time. Yeah, “freedom”.

    I know, that wouldn’t happen to you. You understand the system. You’d start a successful business. No, you’d go to work with your father at age 12 to try to pay off the company store. And you’d die young from black lung or a factory accident because there weren’t the pesky, intrusive so-called safety regulations forced on us by the nanny state.

    The problem with anarchy is that it leaves a vacuum. And that vacuum will be filled by someone with lots of muscle and weapons. So long joyous state of nature!

    • FttM,

      What I’ve never understood about this position is that the surrender of your entire life and volition, everything you do can be sold on the promise, not the fulfillment but the promise of no harm and a better life.

      Everything you have as an individual is always in spite of the government waving a magic fairy dust dispenser and making all the boo-boos better.

      Anarchy isn’t Negan. Negan IS government. Maybe you want the state to sing happy songs in your ear while they’re behind you but they’re still behind you driving you wherever they want. You have no choice. None. Actually, you have one: refusal.

      So that’s what I propose; leave me the fuck alone but like most of the cattle who are content to be prodded and driven, the sight of one individual or several questioning the slavery of the feedlot drives collectivist barnyard denizens to distraction. We can’t have that and that one man must be crushed. He is bucking the system and Socratically drilling the fuck out of the immense false promises, deceit and sheer naked violence that is the state. and if the violent state collapsed; why, they’re would be bloodshed and crime and caging and maiming and killing. It’d be anarchy!

      The bird who has lived in a cage all of its life doesn’t know what its wings are for.

      A single question. Do you not murder your family when you get home because you fear the law or do you love your wife and children? Your moral compass guides your behavior. Yours. Make the choice.

Let us know what you think...