Comment Policy

Save pagePDF pageEmail pagePrint page

 

This blog exists to raise the level of discourse available on the Internet regarding human liberty.  To that end, here is a brief discussion of the comment policy for this blog.

_________________________________

Purpose.  Comments exist to further the discussion of the associated post.  Comments should be used to add relevant detail, expand the premise of the post, or critically analyze the premise. I’m looking for comments that address the main premise rather than try to pick apart some minor side detail.  I’m looking for comments that build on the main premise.  I’d love comments that have an opposing view and are supported with data and logic.  “You’re wrong”, is not a productive comment.

Expectations.  I expect my readership to be a cut above the typical blog readership.  I’d rather have one good comment than ten pointless ones.

Privilege.  Commenting is a privilege that is extended to you, not a right.  Abuse the privilege and you lose the right.

Moderation.  I do not, at this time, moderate comment content prior to publishing.  I do, however, “moderate” comments after they appear, meaning that a comment may be deleted if it fails to meet the standards described herein. I also may make grammar and spelling corrections on occasion.

Data and Logic.  I hold commenters to the same standard as the rest of the blog. Comments must be based on data and logic.  If you make a statement that is not generally accepted as fact, offer a reference.

Speculation.  There is nothing wrong with pure speculation.  I engage in it frequently. However, make it clear that the comment is speculative.  Do not present speculation as fact. To the degree possible, speculation should be based on some underlying fact and must always be logical.

Politeness.  Politeness and respect towards myself and other commenters is mandatory. Argue the idea, not the person.

 

Stupidity.  There’s a famous saying that there are no dumb questions.  As far as this blog is concerned, there certainly are dumb questions and, more to the point, dumb comments.  In order to contribute to raising the level of discourse, you, the commenter, have to do your homework.  I expect a basic level of knowledge about liberty and history.

Deletion.  I never delete a comment because it disagrees with me.  I do, however, delete comments, whether they agree or disagree, when they’re based on stupidity. Comments will also be deleted if they are impolite, disrespectful, or merely argumentative.  If your comment was deleted it was for one or more the following reaons:

-you were disrespectful or impolite
-you made a comment that was unsupported by common knowledge, data, or logic
-you made a comment that didn’t further the discussion
-you made a stupid comment

All of this should not discourage readers from commenting.  Instead, it should encourage readers to put a bit of effort into their comments and try to become part of a conversation rather than part of an argument.  I recognize that there is a fine line between discussing a point of disagreement and arguing.  The difference is that the former is done with an open mind and a willingness to learn and further the discussion while the latter is a simple attempt to “win” and serves no purpose.

I’m sometimes asked why I don’t respond to a given comment.  The answer is that I respond to comments that meet the above criteria – comments that further the discussion, raise new and valid points, and offer insights.

I encourage you to be part of something challenging and worthwhile.  Recognize, though, that means you may have to put a bit of effort into it.

Digg thisShare on YummlyShare on TumblrPrint this pageEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookFlattr the authorShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on VKBuffer this page