It is well known that commonly accepted history is not always what is right, but what has been propagated the most. There is, however, a level of comfort afforded those who may be mistaken regarding our past. After all, what is repeated most often becomes reality. The Wild West gained its colorful reputation through the propagation of dime store novels and poor Hollywood representations. The formation of the legendary Wild West show in 1883 by Buffalo Bill Hickok and others, helped to spread the myths long before television. These shows, books, and movies demonized the injuns’ and glorified the rough and tumble of the outlaw’s lifestyle. Instead of showing millions of people the truth, which would have never sold a book or a ticket, they showed the highlights. What was glorified and eventually memorialized via film by stalwarts like Jimmy Stewart and John Wayne, were the negatives. The Wild West became a place where every day at noon there was a shootout, facing your opponent and gunning him down was accepted as long as you had a badge. The Earps were happening and the Indians were crazy savages that always lost to the cowboys.
I grew up believing this. I lived and breathed the cowboy versus Indian meme. I built six-guns and lever action repeaters from old pieces of two by four. My brothers and I shot and killed each other more times than I care to count, and finally we found daisy bb guns and our fathers welding goggles. Now death had pain involved. The agony of bb’s at 300 fps and the welts raised generated little question that we were men at a young age, and men didn’t complain about war wounds. I was 13 when I found my first previous encampment from a U.S. Calvary bivouac. I remember seeing a piece of leather and metal sticking out of the ground and so I returned with a shovel. After three weeks of digging, I had everything from old copper spoons to buttons with US Calvary on them and laudanum bottles. After dusting it off and polishing the metal pieces, I placed it all in a horizontal box and entered them into the local fair. One first place ribbon later, and several moves left me with nothing of that collection but memories.
What was the Wild West outside of the tourist traps we see now and the stupid reenactments by second rate actors? Was it actually endless gunfights and hangings, or was it more than this? The truth is often over shadowed by that which allows us the most flexibility in discussions and interpretation.
In their ground breaking book, The Not so Wild, Wild West: Property Rights in the Frontier, authors Terry Lee Anderson and Peter Jensen Hill go back through their grandfathers experiences in the Wild West from Montana to Wyoming. They negate the common myth of the daily gunfight and the outlaws ruling everyone. They define a story of hard work, hard choices, and the resulting success of two immigrant businessmen, one who did not even speak English, making their fortunes during the roughest, toughest era of American history.
This was the real Wild West, a land of hard work, hard choices, and true liberty. A country where you worked closely with your neighbors to survive the winters, and took personal responsibility for your decisions. Statistically, the gentle East was more crime ridden following the War of Northern Aggression than the Wild West ever was. In the entire history of the Wild West there was only one confrontation on main-street ever recorded, and that was the shootout between the organized crime leaders the Earps and the vaunted cowboys. Contrary to the myth propagated by Hollywood and modern Tombstone residents, the Earps were not reasonable guys. They were well armed, badged killers who knew that they needed to control the way others in Tombstone spent their money because they would never be caught working a mine or any legitimate enterprise.
The largest amount of deaths that occurred in the Wild West was accidental and work related. Doctors and timely medical care was hard to come by in the East and impossible in the Wild West. Falling from your horse and getting hurt may represent an agonizing death, especially if you were taking care of your farm or ranch by yourself. With days of travel by foot or horseback separating people’s houses and towns, there was a hard land. However, it was by default a land of liberty, for you were in charge of your own destiny. It was by your hands and choices that you became wealthy or survived or sometimes died. What law existed was virtually ignored as being the pathetic meanderings of lazy politicians and carpet bagging gold diggers from the East coast. For close to a hundred years moving west was synonymous with liberty, and was the real American dream for millions.
Since the advent of movies and other genres of entertainment, there have been a focused desire to entertain versus educate. Since the last individual state government was incorporated into the empire we know as the United States, the true nature of the Wild West has been forgotten except by those sons and daughters and grandchildren of the men and women who desired liberty more than the temporary protection offered by the state. Watching a western does not count as history, regardless of how many times the credits say, “based on a true story.”
So when someone asks regarding whether anarchy has ever existed, point them to the Wild West. It was a land of opportunity, liberty and no central government for close to a hundred years. From Kentucky to California, anarchy was in existence and worked well. People prospered and people died, but more than anything people were truly free to live as they wanted and do what worked best for them. A quick look at the state controlled sections of the world throughout history and today and you will see that people die, and people rarely prosper, but most of all people are neither free nor do they know liberty. So what would you prefer, liberty and the ability to thrive based on your own free uncontrolled labor or what you have now?
Agreed Kent, agreed
Hi Jesse…
Interesting! Really never looked at the “Wild West” in that way before, as being “anarchy that worked”… You have a knack for writing… Thanks for sharing =)
Remember, anarchy is not chaos, but simply the absence of centralized governance. For tens of thousands of years depending on which version of history one accepts as “real” mankind was social, had society, and lived in virtual anarchy. People died, people were born and they progressed forward in many ways, that was before written records or better, before governments destroyed traces of the “history” before them. Ever wonder why history is changed so much when new governments take control?
Think recent history and the USA’s attempt to demonized those “evil” injuns who our forefathers completely annihilated using pitched battles and disease.
there is a reason governments “change” history.
Great essay, Jesse!
Pingback: Anarchy In The US | Western Rifle Shooters Association
I appreciate your insights, Bill. Good job. Happy New Year! Russ
Good article, but it was Buffalo Bill Cody who did the wild west show. Hickok was Wild Bill.
Great, great essay, Jesse. Enough theory; it’s nice to hear about the actuality.
And just look what got built. This is the only possible answer.
You are right, but Hicock was a part of it for a short time
thanks for the catch -
And agreed we can do it,
I like this argument, and on principle I agree that anarchy would be best (after a time of “cleaning up the trash”), but…
In the time of the Wild West, foreign nations were not nearly so much of a threat. Sure, they were a threat, there were plenty of wars over land before the Wild West, but I think now it’s even more of an issue.
As only one example, we have to look at China. Do you think for a second they would hesitate to invade a land with no defined national defense network? The weapons that are available today make it entirely too easy for a foreign nation to come invade.
Sure, under anarchy everyone would be free to purchase whatever tools for defense they think they need (or want for the fun of it), but without a structure for defense I have trouble believing it could be effective against an enemy like that.
Defense of property is my biggest problem with anarchy…
My other problem with anarchy is the infrastructure. Back in the Wild West, how much road maintenance was required? Everyone was on horse and carriage. I can envision utilities working without any “central” command (you pay for the service and the company turns it on), but how would the roads get paid for? Make all roads toll roads? What if you need to use the road to get to get to work, but you can’t pay for the privilege until you get paid. (simple example, I know, but…)
I am open to suggestion, but those are really my only issues with anarchy.
Quick answer, infrastructure is shit, Iraq after decades of war has a more viable one, so please give me no more government “infrastructure”
External threats, we PRODUCE nothing of value, we consume massive value from China, they won’t invade, they need us to buy. Outside of that negligent “threat” every other “threat” is or has been manufactured by your government.
Care to comment Bill?
“History”, as propagandized and endlessly poured upon our tortured senses, is hypnosis writ large. I snapped out of that delusion many many years ago. Like that character from ‘They Live’ the filters were removed from my eyes and I started seeing things the way they really are. The so-called Wild West is clever marketing and fear mongering. Just another excuse for criminals/statists to clamor for “law and order”. A make work project for the criminally insane.
Mark Roote,
Your argument is a non-sequitur. A lack of a central state, or any other organized government does not necessarily mean no organized defense. Also, we have to look at why wars are waged; why would China come here and attack us? There are really two reasons for war; to rape the natural resource, and take over the tax base from the existing government. With no established tax base, the Chinese would only have one real reason to attack, and that is for the resource. The free humans on this land mass would have just as much interest as the Chinese in securing the resources found here. Also, they may have larger numbers, but they would be technologically challenged because they would still have their government in place, and governments severely stifle innovation. I am sure the Chinese would be dealt with rather easily if they ever chose such a foolish plan. Further, they have billions of mouths to feed, and so it would be in their best interest to do business rather than wage war, or they would face the wrath of starving people. With the beacon of freedom shining from the land mass known as America, other countries will have a very hard time putting down insurrections in their own countries, because the people will see us, once again, as the example of liberty, and they will want it for themselves.
As for infrastructure: how would you like to get paid for the roads instead of paying for them? In a free society, what is to stop you from selling advertising space on your strip of road? When you think infrastructure think advertising, there are so many ways to pay for it.
I have a feeling your questions and comments are sincere. Stick around zerogov.com and I’m sure they will be addressed in time.
Pingback: Militant Libertarian » Anarchy in the United States
Pingback: FreeWestRadio.com » Blog Archive » Anarchy in the United States